Welcoming the Challenge
A Q&A with Lesser Professor and Dean Kathleen McCartney
Posted: December 1, 2005
by Hanna Bordas
Q:What has the transition from academic dean to acting
dean been like?
A: It's been a very smooth transition, for several
reasons. First, Ellen Lagemann was very helpful in getting me up to speed
on major issues facing the School. I've also been very fortunate
to have strong support from students, faculty, staff, and alumni. This
community has come together and is looking forward to this year.
Lesser Professor and Dean Kathleen McCartney
(Photo by Dina Konovalov, A Dream Picture)
The transition has also been made easier because I'm surrounded
by talented people in leadership roles at the school, including the administrative
dean, Bob Fogel, and the associate deans--Jack Jennings for finance;
Daphne Layton for curriculum and faculty appointments; Bill McKersie for
development; and Jim Stiles, for degree programs. This great group has
been strengthened immeasurably by the addition of [Thompson Professor]
Dick Murnane, who is now serving as academic dean. Dick is a good friend
and colleague, and I value his wise counsel.
Q: How do you see the School evolving over the next
year?
A: We're moving forward on a number of key issues,
perhaps the most important being new faculty appointments. We recently
announced that Hiro Yoshikawa will be joining our senior faculty next
year. Hiro is an outstanding scholar who has done groundbreaking work
in child poverty and education. This year, we have three searches underway
for junior faculty in the areas of international education, language and
literacy, and learning and instructions. As always, we are searching for
strong members of the senior faculty. We will be working with Evelynn
Hammonds, the newly appointed senior vice provost of faculty development
and diversity, to recruit a more diverse faculty.
Q: How have you been measuring the progress of ReadBoston?
A: We look at standardized test scores in the district,
and we also had an evaluation done of some of the models that [Lecturer
on Education and Director of the Human Development and Psychology Program]
Terry Tivnan did here at HGSE along with Lowry Hemphill, who's now
at Wheelock College in Boston. The evaluation looked at four different
literacy models in the district that were trying to improve reading scores.
ReadBoston was involved in bringing these models to the district. Again,
it shows some progress, more in certain areas of reading than in others.
On the curriculum front, we're piloting a second core course this
year under the leadership of [Senior Lecturer] Jim Honan and [Ford Foundation
Professor] Fernando Reimers. This course will build on the work of the
successful first core course, Thinking Like an Educator, now in its third
year. The new course, Thinking and Acting Like an Education Reformer,
will use the case method to understand leadership and policy challenges
in high schools. We are expecting great work from the team of faculty
working on these two courses.
We are also working to create more interschool initiatives across Harvard.
We already have an impressive joint project with the Business School,
the Public Education Leadership Project (PELP), which is an executive
education program that unites the faculty resources of both schools to
address the specific challenges faced by nine urban school districts from
across the country. In the future, I hope we can create innovative partnerships
with other schools, especially the School of Public Health and the Kennedy
School of Government.
Q: As acting dean, you have the opportunity to work
with faculty members in a way that you haven't before. What is exciting
to you about those possibilities?
"I believe a dean's most important
job is to support the work of the faculty, which will be easy because
the HGSE faculty is an incredibly talented group."
A: I believe a dean's most important job is to
support the work of the faculty, which will be easy because the HGSE faculty
is an incredibly talented group. Our faculty is studying the most pressing
issues facing our educational system today--the achievement gap,
language and literacy, urban school reform, new leadership models, testing
and accountability, to name just a few. As part of my job, I will be sharing
the cutting-edge work of the faculty when I meet with alumni, donors,
and visitors to the School--they will be amazed by the impact of
this work on schools and children.
Q: There are those who say that schools of education
are failing students and families. Is this a fair criticism?
A: While it is true that there are pressing problems
facing educators, the problem does not reside exclusively in schools or
schools of education. It is important to consider the times we live in.
For example, children today are more likely to be in unsupervised care
after school, more likely to live in poverty, and more likely to be exposed
to violence and to drugs than ever before. Schools need to partner with
families and communities to identify strategies that promote student achievement--it
will be hard, if not impossible, for schools to do this alone. The relevance
of schools of education has never been greater.
At HGSE, we view our task this way--to prepare education leaders
in practice, policy, and research. We share a bold vision with our students,
namely a world in which all people have access to an education that enables
them to reach their full potential as learners. The value-added of HGSE
is twofold. First, by bringing together scholars from across disciplines
and from varying perspectives, we promote synergies that lead to new solutions.
Second, by providing incentives for practice-based research, our faculty
generates usable knowledge to help practitioners.
Q: Are you going to miss teaching in the classroom this
year?
A: I love teaching, and I do miss being in a classroom
setting. But leading this school is a great challenge that I welcome.
In a way, I will be teaching when I speak to various groups about the
great work going on at HGSE. We have a proud history. We have been at
the forefront of education reform since our founding. I look forward to
sharing with others the ways in which we continue to innovate through
our degree programs, through our professional programs, through our work
with schools, and through our research.
Q: Let's talk a little bit about your research
as a principal investigator with the National Institute of Child Heath
and Human Development (NICHD) Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development,
a longitudinal study going back 15 years. Will you be continuing that
work while you're acting dean?
A: Yes. In fact, I just received a three-year grant
to extend this work. My colleagues and I have been studying a cohort of
1,350 children since they were born in 1991. We're going into the
field in January for another round of data collection. Although this study
began with a focus on child care, it has evolved to a natural history
study of children. We are studying the contexts that shape development,
from child care to school to family to neighborhood. Happily, five outstanding
HGSE doctoral students are working with me on this project, and they are
helping me keep my research program on track.
"A primary problem is the high turnover among
the child care workforce, due to low wages and the fact that parents can't
afford to pay more. The end result is a system that has serious resource
challenges."
Q: What have your findings shown to this point?
A: Our findings show that child care in this country
is mediocre at best. A primary problem is the high turnover among the
child care workforce, due to low wages and the fact that parents can't
afford to pay more. The end result is a system that has serious resource
challenges. The effect of child care quality is apparent on a range of
child outcomes, from vocabulary to reading to math to behavior problems.
We know, too, that better state regulations for staff education and staff-child
ratios result in better quality and thereby better child outcomes. Thus,
the policy implications from our data are clear.
Q: Is there any way to untangle questions about what's
best for children amidst changing societal issues such as the rise of
two-income families?
A: I think we need to deploy a range of methods to address
this, from rich ethnographic studies of families, to large-scale survey
studies, to experimental interventions.
Q: On a lighter note, what sort of books are you reading
in your free time?
A: I have very eclectic tastes when it comes to books.
I will confess that I bought Harry Potter and the Half- Blood Prince the
day it went on sale. More recently, I also enjoyed Kafka on the Shore,
by the Japanese novelist Haruki Murakami, a master of magical realism.
Finally, I am in the midst of reading How the Way We Talk Can Change the
Way We Work by [Meehan Professor] Bob Kegan, my colleague here at HGSE,
and Lisa Lahey; this book is helping me think about the challenges ahead
this year.
A version of this story appeared in the 2004–2005 Annual Report.