My Summer: Peter Blake
This is the third in a series of articles exploring the summer work
of HGSE doctoral students.
Posted October 4, 2006
Examining
why children fight over toys led HGSE doctoral student Peter Blake to spend
time with four species of apes this summer.
Blake researches child development using comparative methods, focusing specifically
on property and ownership and the psychology of stealing. With both pre-verbal
children and primates, researchers can't ask what they think so it's necessary
to design experiments that will produce different behaviors and infer the thought
process from those behaviors, he said.
As part of a Mind, Brain, and Behavior grant, Blake traveled to Germany where
he spent two months working at the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig this summer.
His research centered on primate thinking, and he worked with renowned comparative
and developmental psychologist Mike Tomasello.
"It was an excellent environment and great experience," Blake said.
"I took the developmental perspective [I learned at HGSE] with me and
began to develop the comparative."
At the institute, Blake designed an experiment that examined whether apes were
sensitive to human transactions and acts of stealing. The experiment involved
apes observing one adult taking an object from the other and pretending to hurt
the person. Through the experiment, Blake wanted to test whether apes would
react to the more dominant human.
"Although the apes were very excited by the fight between humans, they
did not choose to help the winner of the fight and returned the object equally,"
Blake said. "The results were not conclusive, but this experiment showed
us that from an orangutan's perspective, dominance may not be the most important
factor in deciding who to help or who has a right to an object. Given the strong
dominance hierarchies in this species, we expected the winner would be favored."
Blake believes such studies can provide some explanation for the origins of
these human behaviors.
Although working with the primates was a rewarding experience (when they weren't
demolishing his apparatus), the data collected on apes didn't make the
biggest impact on his experience--his colleagues did.
"I was able to watch 10 other experiments and learn what did and didn't
work in the past," Blake said. "The exchange of information [among
colleagues] was just great."
So great that Blake said he hopes to return to Germany on a Fulbright scholarship
to continue his work with animals.
"I've learned that apes are amazing animals and worth studying,"
he said. "Apes are fascinating because they are incredible problem solvers
and yet have a very different mental profile from humans. Like us, they learn
some things very easily while other tasks prove very difficult. By comparing
human cognitive abilities with those of other primates we can learn a lot about
how we learn."