HER logo

Harvard Educational Review
A leader in educational scholarship for over 70 years

 

 

 

Fall 2003 Issue

Article Abstracts:

 

Fall 2003 Reviews of Current Books (Full-Text)


Order the Fall 2003 issue

Click here to browse back issues of Harvard Educational Review

  Back to top


Harvard Educational Review
Fall 2003 Article Abstracts:

Popular Culture and Democratic Practice

Nadine Dolby

In this introduction to the study of popular culture in education, Nadine Dolby offers an insightful review of the literature informing this work. Her essay sets the tone and theme for this Special Issue, and begins to address why educators and educational researchers should pay particular attention to popular culture. Discussing the relevant literature and introducing readers to historical debates in the field, Dolby distinguishes between various understandings of popular culture and approaches to studying its relationship to education. Ultimately, Dolby argues, the importance of popular culture and its connection to education lies in the role it plays as a site for engaging in the process of democratic practice. She encourages educators to engage young people in a deep exploration of the multiple dimensions of popular culture and the public sphere, and highlights examples of this kind of engagement. (pp. 258-284)

Back to Table of Contents


Merchants of Death: Media Violence and American Empire

David Trend

In this article, David Trend illuminates the centrality of violent narratives in U.S. popular culture. He describes the ubiquity of violent imagery and the popular discourse it has generated. Trend argues that research on media violence has created a large academic subculture that has done little to advance our understanding of who is watching violent media and why. He draws on multidisciplinary sources and calls for scholars to collaborate across fields to reframe the discussion. He concludes that the mass production of violent media may be wasting an enormous resource that might otherwise be used for tremendous public good. (pp. 285-308)

Back to Table of Contents


Media Education and the End of the Critical Consumer

David Buckingham

In this article, David Buckingham addresses the challenges media educators face in dealing with postmodern media culture. Buckingham begins by outlining the nature of contemporary developments in children's media environments and how these relate to broader changes in their social status. He argues that these developments represent a fundamental challenge to the modernist project of media education, with its emphasis on the production of critical consumers. Buckingham then moves on to draw on his own empirical studies of media classrooms in the United Kingdom. He deals first with the issue of identity formation and the implications of current changes for teaching about representation. Second, he considers the role of play, particularly in relation to students' media production, and the potential limitations of a more ludic, or playful, approach. Buckingham then addresses the difficulties posed by students' use of parody, both ideologically and in terms of learning. Finally, he considers a more comprehensively postmodern approach to media pedagogy. Ultimately, Buckingham suggests that the modernist project cannot simply be abandoned by media educators, but that it does need to be comprehensively reconsidered in light of contemporary developments. (pp. 309-327)

Back to Table of Contents


"Welcome to the Jam": Popular Culture, School Literacy, and the Making of Childhoods

Anne Haas Dyson

In this ethnographic study of a group of African American first graders, Anne Haas Dyson illustrates the textual processes - the deliberate manipulation of popular cultural material - involved in the children's shared practices as playful children and good friends. These same processes shaped the ways the children made sense of and began to participate in school literacy. The observed children did not approach official literacy activities in their classroom as though they had nothing to do with their own childhoods. They made use of familiar media-influenced practices and symbolic material to take intellectual and social action in the official school world. Dyson offers a fresh perspective on children's experiences with popular media, emphasizing that they are an integral aspect of contemporary childhoods, not an external threat. Moreover, she presents an alternative view of the pathways and mechanisms through which children enter into school literacy practices, one that illuminates how children build from the very social and symbolic stuff of their own childhoods. (pp. 328-361)

Back to Table of Contents


Open Mics and Open Minds: Spoken Word Poetry in African Diaspora Participatory Literacy Communities

Maisha T. Fisher

In this article, Maisha T. Fisher explores the resurgence of spoken word and poetry venues in the Black community and their salience as venues for cultural identity development and literacy practice. Calling them African Diaspora Participatory Literacy Communities (ADPLCs), Fisher describes two open mic poetry settings that recall the feeling and communal centrality of jazz clubs and literary circles of the Harlem Renaissance. These ADPLCs are predominantly created and supported by people of African descent who actively participate in literacy-centered events outside of school and work settings. Through ethnographic research, Fisher explores how these venues function as literacy centers in two communities. Fisher discusses the cultural practices that underlie the organization and orchestration of these events, explores what inspires and motivates participants, and examines how these venues operate as sites for multiple literacies. (pp. 362-389)

Back to Table of Contents


Foot Soldiers of Modernity: The Dialectics of Cultural Consumption and the 21st-Century School

Paul Willis

Drawing on more than twenty-five years of experience researching and theorizing about culture, youth, and society, Paul Willis presents a broad theoretical argument that positions the school as the site and instrument through which cultural responses to material conditions are played out. Willis distinguishes between three "waves of modernization" that stem from radical shifts in technological and material production and that are accompanied by specific cultural forms, particularly forms of youth culture. He argues that it is from these specific cultural forms that an effective struggle for social change can emerge. (pp. (390-415)

Back to Table of Contents


Cultural Negotiations: Puerto Rican Intellectuals in a State-Sponsored Community Education Project, 1948-1968

Cati Marsh Kennerley

The Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (autonomous commonwealth), established in 1952, redefined the political relationship between the United States and its colony. The ambiguous political status — autonomy without sovereignty, self-government without self-determination — created new social, political, and cultural contradictions. The island’s first elected governor, Luis Muñoz Marín, was committed to promoting an essentialized Puerto Rican culture centered around the idealization of traditional rural life, while simultaneously creating a new democratic citizenship, both of which would bolster the new government’s legitimacy before its people. In this article, Puerto Rican scholar Cati Marsh Kennerley explores the collective work done by the División de Educación de la Comunidad (DivEdCo), the government educational agency charged with promulgating Muñoz Marín’s ideas about Puerto Rican culture and citizenship. Marsh Kennerley draws from a wide variety of sources to reconstruct an untold history, analyze its contradictions, obtain lessons from DivEdCo’s negotiations, and point out its relevance for understanding contemporary Puerto Rican culture. (pp. 416–448)

Back to Table of Contents


Contesting Culture: Identity and Curriculum Dilemmas in the Age of Globalization, Postcolonialism, and Multiplicity

Cameron McCarthy, Michael Giardina, Susan Harewood, and Jin-Kyung Park

In this closing article, Cameron McCarthy, Michael Giardina, Susan Harewood, and Jin-Kyung Park draw on the preceding articles of this Special Issue to develop the argument that educators need to pay special attention to developments associated with human immigration, cultural globalization, and the rapid migration of cultural and economic capital and electronically mediated images. In the plurality of social and cultural sites of practice reflected in these articles, McCarthy et al. find implications for pedagogical practice and the educational preparation of school youth. They specifically address questions concerning the reproduction of culture, identity, and community as they relate to contemporary educational debates. Given this range of cultural practices, how should we address the topic of culture and identity in the organization of school knowledge? McCarthy et al. suggest that pedagogical interventions that privilege popular culture as a site of legitimate critique can open up new avenues of exploration and investigation to a radical, progressive democracy premised on the basic values of love, care, and equality for all humanity. (pp. 449-465)

Back to Table of Contents


  Back to top


Harvard Educational Review
Fall 2003 Reviews of Current Books
(Full Text)

 

 
Desis in the House: Indian American Youth Culture in New York City
by Sunaina Marr Maira.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2002. 256 pp. $64.50, $19.95 (paper). 

The Immigration Act of 1965 ended decades of restrictions on Indian immigration to the United States. Since then, the population of Indians living in the United States has grown from 50,000 to well over 1.5 million. Today, second-generation Indian Americans comprise a considerable portion of Asian American youth (approximately 12%) in this country. Still, the experience of Indian American young people has barely been documented, particularly in urban areas where these youth have created their own culture that fuses traditional elements of their pasts with modern elements of their multicultural presents. 

In Desis in the House, Sunaina Marr Maira presents the results of an ethnographic study documenting the experiences of second-generation Indian American youth in New York City. She asks the following questions: “What are the meanings of this youth culture in the lives of Indian American youth? How do Indian American youth negotiate simultaneously the collective nostalgia for India (re)created by their parents and the coming-of-age rituals of American youth culture?” (pp. 15–16). An assistant professor of Asian American studies, Maira has experience researching the experience of South Asian immigrants to the United States. In this study, she focuses on popular culture as a tool that enables Indian American youth to negotiate and manage this tension between “nostalgia” and “cool” in their attempts to shape and assert their evolving identities. 

Chapter one provides historical context about the immigration of Indian Americans to the United States and outlines the subsequent chapters. In chapter two, Maira explores the Manhattan “desi scene.” She defines desi as “a colloquial term for someone ‘native’ to South Asia and one that has taken hold among many second-generation youth in the Diaspora of Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Sri Lankan, or even Indo-Caribbean, descent” (p. 2). The desi scene is one in which Indian American (and South Asian American) youth go to clubs to dance to a style of remix music called “bangra,” which blends traditional Indian music with more modern elements from hip-hop. Maira shows how, in this subculture, the youth actively create the popular culture that they simultaneously consume and develop understandings of their gendered racial identities. 

Many of the youth with whom Maira spoke mentioned the different norms operating for men and women in this subculture. Men consider it important to flaunt their material power through brand-name clothing. Maira states that this masculine behavior is linked to nationalism and signals a certain sense of ethnic authenticity. By contrast, women believe that both male and female desi youth value sexually provocative behavior on the dance floor, but these women also criticize other women for sexually suggestive behavior that goes against what is considered proper behavior for an Indian American woman.  

In chapter three, Maira uses the term cultural nostalgia to describe the range of activities the youth engage in to explore the Indian side of their hybrid identity and feel more ethnically authentic. She writes, “For many of the youth I spoke to, the notion of being ‘truly’ or ‘really’ Indian involved possession of certain knowledge or participation in certain activities. . . . The ideology of nostalgia . . . is the ethnicized flip side to a notion of subcultural ‘cool’ based on American youth culture” (pp. 87–88). Many of the youth who Maira interviewed grew up in predominantly White suburbs, attended predominantly White high schools, and socialized with predominantly White families. Maira describes key events in what these youth spoke of as “coming out” as ethnically Indian, such as independent trips “going back” to India or participating in Indian American and South Asian American college group activities that often feature traditional Indian films, music, and dance. 

Chapter four revisits the theme of gender roles and their link to nostalgia for Indian American youth. Masculinity is idealized through strength, economic power, and authority, while femininity is idealized through purity and chastity. These images develop in many ways out of pressures that the youth feel from their immigrant parents. For example, Vijay says, “I’m the oldest son . . . and for all practical purposes I’m competing against my father for everything I do” (p. 162). Reena tells Maira, “It’s so frustrating because the American value is you have to be successful . . . and then the Indian culture is like, it’s family, it’s family, it’s always family first!” (p. 161). While these youth talk about recognizing and even resisting these pressures, they simultaneously promote them through their cultural practices. For example, males can easily adopt a “gangsta” style in their dress without compromising their ethnicity, whereas women are more often expected to wear traditional Indian clothing. Maira calls for scholars of feminist cultural studies to examine masculinity in this youth culture context, and to recognize that ideals of femininity are influenced by the material notions of masculinity with which they interact. 

In her final chapter, Maira emphasizes that scholars must use an interdisciplinary lens to study the experiences of second-generation immigrant youth, claiming that structural forces in the academy, particularly in the humanities, prevent the collaborative endeavors necessary for this type of study. She also criticizes the unwavering link between discipline and methodology, wherein cultural studies tend to produce theoretical analysis and anthropology tends to produce more empirical analysis. She worries that documents of the experience of Indian American youth and groups like them will get lost if scholars do not use multiple methodologies to bring together disciplines such as anthropology, cultural studies, and Asian American studies. Desis in the House demonstrates how ethnography in particular can be applied to the field of Asian American studies. By linking empiricism with cultural studies, Maira brings an increased understanding of how the multiple forces of ethnicity, class, gender, and popular culture interact to influence the experiences of one particular group of second-generation immigrant youth. 

A.G.  

Back to Table of Contents


 
Growing Up with Television: Everyday Learning among Adolescents
by JoEllen Fisherkeller.
Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2002. 165 pp. $19.95. 

The influence of television on today’s youth is often a subject of intense debate and public interest. Once envisioned as a medium for transmitting information to enrich our educational lives, television has become our primary source not only of news and educational material but also of entertainment. Television is ubiquitous, and its presence has become virtually impossible to ignore. Young people in particular spend a tremendous amount of time watching and talking about television. Understanding how television influences youth and their educational and social development is an important part of understanding the intersection between popular culture and education. 

In Growing Up with Television: Everyday Learning among Adolescents, JoEllen Fisherkeller presents portraits of three adolescents, focusing on the role television plays in their lives and education. As Fisherkeller notes in her introduction, “Even though cultural and media studies now conceive of audiences as active meaning-makers at some level, most often adults refer to youth as passive receivers of media messages and images” (p. 2). Her purpose for this book was to illuminate how youth engage in active meaning-making as they interact with television. 

The three youth portrayed in Growing Up with Television are students at an alternative middle school in New York City in the early 1990s. Fisherkeller spent more than two months as an ethnographer at the school, surveying fifty students about their general media habits, including frequency of and motivation for watching television. She chose six students as focal participants, with whom she conducted in-depth interviews and household and school observations over the course of a year. Her book contains individual portraits of three of the original six, who represent the greatest range of diversity in terms of gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, family background, and personality. 

The first portrait is of Marina, a sixth-grade girl who is a first-generation immigrant from the Dominican Republic. Marina enjoyed television that portrayed events that were either part of her real or desired experience. In particular, she liked television shows that depicted what she called “real” families, such as Roseanne, as well as those that depicted characters who represented what she wanted to achieve in her future life, such as Who’s the Boss?, which portrays a successful female advertising executive. Marina also spoke about how television taught her about social problems, often depicting multiple sides to an issue and prompting her to sort out those multiple perspectives. She said that TV movies help her learn about “drunk driving [and] things like that. . . . And about AIDS and things like that. And drugs” (p. 42). Marina also appropriated television images to define and describe her own identity. For example, because of her physical maturity, school officials and peers often described Marina as sexually advanced or experienced, which was not true. To deal with this identity dilemma, Marina appropriated the image of explicitly sexual women like Madonna, whom she described as a strong woman who is successful despite what others think or say about her. 

The second portrait is of Christopher, an African American boy in the seventh grade who, at the time of the study, had recently moved to New York City to live with his father and stepmother, after being neglected by his mother. Fisherkeller describes a change in Christopher over the two years of the study, from a shy, confused, and lonely boy to a confident and sociable one. These changes were reflected in his television viewing habits. At the beginning of the study, Christopher watched television to pass time and keep company. By the end, however, television was a last-resort source of entertainment for Christopher, after basketball and spending time with friends. In addition, his tastes evolved from a preference for science fiction and fantasy genres to reality-based, prime-time situation comedies. Fisherkeller interprets Christopher’s changing preferences as a “settling down.” Whereas he once felt most comfortable with himself in an imaginary world of cartoon superheroes, he became more comfortable wrestling with his identities in a more realistic world, such as by identifying with Theo Huxtable (of The Cosby Show), an African American male who demonstrates strong family values. 

The final portrait in the book is of Samantha, an Irish–Jewish American girl from a middle-class Bronx neighborhood who is in the seventh grade. Because Samantha had a learning disability that made it difficult for her to read and excel in school, she often turned to television for entertainment. Samantha’s parents were educated, politically active professionals. In Samantha’s home, television viewing was a family activity: they all engaged in lively ongoing criticism of the shows they were watching. She particularly liked talk shows, since they allowed her to engage in a conversation about important social issues, and disliked programs that “insulted” viewers with crude humor. Samantha also watched television to define her identity. She was often described by her teachers as an aggressive, outspoken student, and she came to terms with this identity in part through her admiration of the title character in Murphy Brown, an opinionated, independent, and successful female television newscaster. 

Fisherkeller brings these portraits together in the final two chapters by identifying common, cross-cutting themes. One theme is the use of television to help youth find strategies for realizing visions of their future “possible selves.” For the three youth, these visions come from home and family cultures; however, television provided a way for these youth to make these possible selves seem more realizable. Each of these youth had television characters with whom he or she identified as having characteristics that he or she hoped and expected to develop. Each of these youth also was acutely aware of television as a commercial industry that can manipulate images to serve certain ends. Fisherkeller argues that “they have learned, at least tacitly, that engaging in the making of multiple media forms is a credible and powerful means of economic survival and of participating in public life” (p. 130). 

Fisherkeller ends with an epilogue about Marina, Christopher, and Samantha, including excerpts of interviews conducted at the end of high school and again a few years after graduation. She intentionally provides verbatim quotes with little analysis, letting the youth speak for themselves and allowing the reader to develop his or her own insights. The role of television in these individuals’ lives shifted dramatically. As the students grew older, television was less influential in terms of helping them understand their identities and more influential in helping them become critical consumers of media. However, television continued to play an important part in mobilizing them to assert their identities in multiple contexts. Growing Up with Television is a useful addition to the field of popular cultural studies. It is an in-depth exploration of how youth use television and the images we receive through television to deal with personal and social conflicts and tensions in their daily lives. Because these stories come from the youth themselves, this book is not only authentic but also an enjoyable read. 

A.G. 

Back to Table of Contents


 
Latino/a Popular Culture
edited by Michelle Habell-Pallán and Mary Romero.
New York: New York University Press, 2002. 280 pp. $55.00. 

According to the 2000 U.S. Census, Latinos are now the largest ethnic group in the United States. Thus, it is imperative that all members of U.S. society better understand this heterogeneous group. As Michelle Habell-Pallán and Mary Romero, authors of Latino/a Popular Culture, state: 

For Latinos at this millennial moment, as well as for members of the dominant Anglo and African American cultures, popular culture takes center stage in struggles over defining meaning. Within the magic, ritualistic, and symbolic realm of popular culture, narratives are constructed about the role Latinos will or will not play as part of the national body. (p. 4)  

This is why volumes like this one edited by Habell-Pallán, assistant professor in American Ethnic Studies at the University of Washington, and Mary Romero, professor of Justice Studies at Arizona University, are needed. They have woven together articles that examine how American popular culture has been defining “Latino” and “Latina.” They argue against a monolithic conception of Latinos/as, since the heterogeneity within the Latino/a community is extensive in terms of race, class, language, nationality, place of origin, citizenship, and geography, and present “a juxtaposition and cross-examination of the mosaic of contradictory and congratulatory images thrown up by the mass media” (p. 2). 

In the introduction, the editors remind us that we must not look at the Latino/a culture in isolation or only within the U.S. context. With recent migration patterns, we must understand the connections and bonds forming between people not only in one country but also across countries in the Americas. While the editors might have explored transnationalism even more, this volume serves as a good “launching point” (p. 15). 

The critical stance of the book’s introduction establishes the foundation for the essays and contextualizes Latino/a popular culture by discussing the following themes: “Constructing Latinas and Latinos: ¿Qué Somos y Cómo Somos?” (“What are we and how are we?”); “Mapping Latina/o Popular Culture and Cultural Studies”; and “Issues of Representation, Audience, and Production.”  

The volume’s essays are divided in sections along specific genres in cultural studies: media/culture, music, theater and art, and sports. The relatively short pieces make for quick and accessible reads, yet also offer new material for those already familiar with Latino/a culture and cultural studies.  

The section on media and culture includes essays by Arlene Dávila (“Talking Back: Spanish Media and U.S. Latinidad”), Frances Negrón-Montaner (“Barbie’s Hair: Selling Out Puerto Rican Identity in the Global Market”); Tanya Katerí Hernández (“The Buena Vista Social Club: The Racial Politics of Nostalgia”); and Luz Calvo (“‘Lemme Stay, I Want to Watch’: Ambivalence in Borderlands Cinema”). Each reader will be drawn to different essays based on their particular areas of interest. Having grown up in Mexico watching soap operas, I found Dávila’s essay particularly fascinating, since she examines how focus groups of Latino/as in New York perceive TV and radio channels geared toward Latinos/as, finding that in some ways these channels reproduce existing hierarchies among this group, such as a preference for light-skin tones. Dávila reminds us that we must acknowledge the existence of racial and ethnic hierarchies among Latinos/as in the United States (and specifically New York) due to their particular histories, reasons for immigration, relationship between the United States and their countries of origin, and position within the city (pp. 32–33). Readers who played with Barbies may find the article on Puerto Rican Barbies interesting, especially as to the meaning that a Barbie designated “Puerto Rican” created in the political and identity arenas. Those who were hypnotized by the music in the Buena Vista Social Club documentary (or fiction, in many ways, as revealed by the article) will appreciate the article by Katerí Hernández, who examines the role of the American music producer who “discovers,” “saves,” or colonizes the aging musicians on the island of Cuba. The article further discusses the U.S.-Cuba relationship and the power of the U.S. music industry. 

The section on music contains essays by Ana Patricia Rodríguez (“Encrucijadas: Rubén Blades at the Transnational Crossroads”); Josh Kun (“’The Sun Never Sets on MTV: Tijuana NO! and the Border Music Video”); Deborah R. Vargas (“Bidi Bidi Bom Bom: Selena and Tejana Music in the Making of Tejas”); and Raquel Rivera (“Hip Hop and New York Puerto Ricans”). Rodríguez’s article informs us that renowned Latino musician Rubén Blades’ Central American identity has been ignored, yet emerges in some of his music, where he speaks of the Central American transnational experiences and migrations. According to Rodríguez, the song “La Rosa de los Vientos” exemplifies songs that advocate the development of extended Central American Latino identities and alliances. Josh Kun, on the other hand, writes about Tijuana NO!, the U.S.-Mexico border band, the resistance music they perform, and what it means to have it promoted (or not) by MTV and its globalizing music empire.  

The theater and art section includes articles by Alberto Sandoval Sánchez (“Paul Simon’s The Capeman: The Staging of Puerto Rican National Identity as Spectacle and Commodity on Broadway”); Melissa A. Fitch (“Gender Bending in Latino Theater: Johnny Diego, The Hispanic Zone, and Deporting the Divas by Guillermo Reyes”); Michelle Habell-Pallán (“‘Don’t Call Us Hispanic’: Popular Latino Theater in Vancouver”); William A. Nericcio (“A Decidedly ‘Mexican’ and ‘American’ Semi[er]otic Transference: Frida Kahlo in the Eyes of Gilbert Hernandez”); and Juan Velasco (“Performing Multiple Identities: Guillermo Gómez-Peña and His ‘Dangerous Border Crossings’”). Habell-Pallán’s article offers a clear discussion on the idea of transnationality and multiple identities for the members of a theater group in Vancouver that followed Boal’s Theater of the Oppressed process. The author explains, “The play seeks to disrupt outdated cultural conceptions about who constitutes Canada and to define a citizenship of the Americas” (p. 178). Habell-Pallán also suggests that the use of Chicano elements in the play reveals the transculturation of Chicano cultural production outside of the United States, compelling Chicano studies to move beyond the U.S.-Mexico framework toward strategies to connect people of color in the Americas. 

For those interested in the genre of sports, Latino/a Popular Culture offers a section with articles by Adrian Burgos Jr. (“Learning America’s Other Game: Baseball, Race, and Study of Latinos”); Christopher A. Shinn (“Fútbol Nation: U.S. Latinos and the Goal of a Homeland”); and Gregory Rodríguez (“Boxing and Masculinity: The History and (Her)story of Oscar de la Hoya”). Burgos’ essay is especially fascinating in terms of the story of baseball player “Sandy” Nava, who was apparently Mexican American and played during the second half of the nineteenth century. According to Burgos, the presence of Latinos forced baseball’s racial system of Black and White to expand by forming new racial/ethnic categories that conferred a circumscribed Whiteness or revising older categories such as the notion of “‘Spanish’ identity” (p. 235). The latter emphasized that some Latinos came from Spanish descent and implied that they had “pure blood” (p. 235), since they had not mixed with Blacks. 

Latino/a Popular Culture greatly contributes to the genres of both cultural studies and Latino studies. The editors exhort undergraduate and graduate students to continue looking at Latino/a popular culture as “a site of invention, critique and pleasure” (p. 16), since much work still needs to be done in this area. 

A.K. 

Back to Table of Contents


 
Brave New Voices: The Youth Speaks Guide to Teaching Spoken Word Poetry 
by Jen Weiss and Scott Herndon. 
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2001. 120 pp. $15.75. 

Many young people in the United States are immersed in the world of popular culture, particularly hip-hop music. For this reason, Jen Weiss and Scott Herndon’s book, Brave New Voices: The Youth Speaks Guide to Teaching Spoken Word Poetry, will be helpful for teachers working with young people in all kinds of settings. Weiss and Herndon invite teachers to draw on young people’s experience with hip-hop to push their students to become conscious and critical producers of the spoken word. As Weiss and Herndon assert, young people will then feel more confident about themselves and share with others what they have to say about the society in which we live. 

Brave New Voices is based on the workshops that Weiss, Herndon, and others have conducted in New York and San Francisco for Youth Speaks, a nonprofit, grassroots organization. The book is a guide for teachers, community organizations, and educators in afterschool programs who would like to teach about spoken word poetry, or “poetry that is written on a page but performed for an audience” (p. 118). Weiss and Herndon tell readers, “We want to put poetry into the hands of as many teenagers as we can. Our strongest connection is through you, our community of dedicated and passionate teachers” (p. xvii). Brave New Voices is meant for “teachers who want to be involved in the creative lives of their students” (p. xxi). 

The book is designed as a blueprint for a five-week workshop on spoken word poetry. It is divided into six chapters. Each of the first five details one week of the workshop, and the sixth explains how to culminate the workshop with a live performance of student work. The first chapter, “Week 1: Getting Started,” gives teachers some parameters for beginning the workshop. The authors emphasize that the workshop should be student driven. Weiss and Herndon warn against teachers exerting tight control over the structure of the lesson or the activities of the students. They invite teachers to allow themselves to feel afraid of the students, and to believe that any resistance they may encounter from the students is “vulnerable resistance,” or resistance that the students may have to feeling vulnerable, which will subside as the students are drawn out of their shells and into the workshop. The authors effectively convince readers that teachers must create a space that allows for the inclusion of all students’ voices so as to “empower everyone and anyone who wants to start writing about their world and begin speaking their minds with sharpened wits and chiseled words” (p. 19). 

The second chapter, “Week 2: Generating Momentum,” addresses how students can form a community in which they themselves become one another’s audience and provide support and feedback to each other. Weiss and Herndon suggest that students think of their poems as meaningless until they bring them to student-centered workshops, read and discuss them, and have other students provide them with their insights. 

“Week 3: Using Rhythm and Hip-Hop” invites teachers to expand and coach students to polish the work the students are starting to write. The authors define hip-hop and assure readers that they don’t have to be experts in the genre in order to conduct the workshop. As they explain, “We think it’s a boon because when you encounter unfamiliar terrain, you must listen” (p. 60). The authors encourage teachers to look beyond spoken word poetry as merely a written work, but also “as a complex of written, visual, and aural performances” (p. 62), and to create a pedagogical space in which they can be surprised and have fun with the young people in the workshop. Weiss and Herndon suggest, however, that “the sooner you can learn what poetry means to your students, the sooner you can begin to coach them to write productively in whatever mode they choose” (p. 55). 

In “Week 4: The Politics of Poetry,” Weiss and Herndon recount the history of the spoken word as an art form, especially its link to politics and political voice for marginalized groups. According to the authors, the spoken word movement purposefully broke away from the highbrow, academic definition of poetry and operated outside of the conventional frame of “serious” poetry. Instead, spoken word poetry was founded on an acceptance “of all cultures, social types, and voices” (p. 78) and focused on the politics and poetics of oppressed people. This chapter is informative, but even though students do not learn it until the fourth week of the workshop, readers of this text would have benefited from knowing this background information sooner. A contextual and historical understanding of spoken word from the beginning would give the readers a lens through which to consider all the chapters in the book. 

“Week 5: Revision and Performance,” describes how students revise their work based on the critiques given by their peers. Weiss and Herndon suggest guidelines for revisions, including a clear understanding of what the poem is about, what it means to its creator, and how to make that meaning clear to the audience. They also provide some specific exercises for revising. 

The final chapter, “Letting the Poets Speak: The Poetry Event,” gives teachers suggestions and checklists to help them organize a spoken word poetry performance with the students’ help. This chapter is technically helpful but the least inspiring, due to its checklist-like presentation. This ending is especially anticlimactic considering that, for the five preceding chapters, the authors included works by and reflections of young people who have participated in Youth Speaks. 

In addition to including young people’s voices throughout Brave New Voices, the authors provide suggested exercises at the end of each chapter. This will help teachers who do not have much experience in teaching poetry, spoken word poetry in particular. Some of the exercises are clear and exciting, while others may not be specific enough to guide some teachers. The book also provides useful references to poems, documentaries, and other resources.  

The book is an inspiring introduction for teachers unfamiliar with spoken word poetry, although novices may need more guidance. For teachers familiar with spoken word poetry and with the culture of hip-hop, this book may provide the jump-start they need to organize a workshop. For others, like this reviewer, the book may spark thinking about poetry and youth empowerment. It brought to light the fact that there is a large culture of spoken word poetry for young people, and all of us should consider seriously how we can integrate elements of it at the very least, especially as it provides an alternative approach to learning from what is usually presented in a traditionally structured school, which may serve to hook students and create a space for their voices to be heard. 

A.K. 

Back to Table of Contents


 
Peace
by Tucker Shaw.
New York: Alloy Books, 2002. 142 pp. $9.99. 

As I sorted through what seemed mostly unimpressive literature in the Young Adults section of a bookstore chain, Tucker Shaw’s Peace attracted me with the peace logo on its cover. This book may be of interest to teachers in high schools, adults working with youth in other alternative settings, parents, and, most importantly, the youth to whom the book is explicitly directed. 

The impetus for Peace was September 11, 2001. Shaw states that, since that day, 

things have changed. We now have new priorities, new challenges, new questions, new knowledge, new fears, new concerns, new heroes. We are, around the world, new people. Peace really means something now. And it’s something we are all responsible for. Each one of us. Working toward peace is within our control. (p. 3) 

Shaw seeks to encourage young people to think about what peace means to them, to highlight the heroic acts of people throughout the world who have fought for peace peacefully, and to incite young readers to fight proactively for peace. 

Shaw divides the book into five sections. Part One, What Is Peace? asks teenagers what peace is, what it is not, and in what kinds of places young people seek peace. An array of responses from youth, mostly from the United States, follows. This section offers readers a glimpse of how some young people understand the concept of peace through their own words. For instance, an 18-year-old man from New York defines peace as “more than just the absence of war. It is equality and justice. It can be applied to the world, or to one’s own personal peace of mind” (p. 10). Unfortunately, it is unclear how the author elicited or sorted through the responses from youth, since some of the same youth voices, especially those from outside the United States, appear often in the book. 

In Part Two, a historical section entitled Peace Then, Shaw opens by describing the twentieth century as the most violent in history. He offers highlights of inspirational leaders who have fought for peace and justice, offering brief biographies of historical figures or “Peace Greats,” such as Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., Steven Biko, and Nelson Mandela, which are meant to inspire and inform readers about leaders who have fought for peace through nonviolent resistance. This chapter also lists the last twenty-five winners of the Nobel Peace Prize and briefly describes the reasons for the awards. The section ends with a brief recounting of moments that Shaw believes contributed to peace in the twentieth century. However, he tends to summarize complicated historical events in just a few lines, thus reducing their impact, and he also offers a number of questionable generalizations. For instance, Shaw states that populations soared in poor nations, and that people “were dissatisfied with their lives, making them more likely to support violent changes” (p. 21). The book would stimulate deeper understanding of world situations if the author delved into more historical details.  

Part Three, Peace Now, focuses mostly on the September 11 events. According to Shaw, “On that day everything changed. Suddenly we woke up” and had to live in a new world (p. 50). Like Part One, this section elicits the voices of young people describing where they were on that day, what they were thinking, what they did to help out after 9/11, and how their lives have changed since. Included are two U.S. Muslim youth’s responses (originally from Tanzania and Pakistan) to the mistreatment and harassment they suffered due to their classmates’ ignorance. Theirs are stories of dignity and resilience. For example, a schoolmate told a young Pakistani man that he must be the son of Bin Laden. In response, he wrote an article in which he stated that “the man behind the terrorist attack is just as ignorant as the man who torched the car shop [of a Pakistani in Houston], who is just as ignorant as the student that saw me as the son of a terrorist” (p. 89). Another story is of a high school student who was suspended from school for wearing a T-shirt that sarcastically criticized the U.S. bombing in Afghanistan. This young woman was willing to stand her ground in opposing the war overseas because she felt that “what we’re doing to them is just as bad as what they did to us, and I think it needs to be stopped” (p. 92). These stories show youth at their most courageous. 

In Part Four, Peace Tomorrow, Shaw again reminds his readers that “we can’t wait for anyone else to bring us peace. . . . If we want peace, we have to work for it together . . . and we’ll have to keep working for it forever” (p. 110). Again, Shaw includes youth responses to questions about how they are making a difference now and how they will contribute in the future. Shaw also presents more “Peace Greats,” including Rigoberta Menchú and the Dalai Lama. The strength of this section lies in its quick portraits of young people pursing peace in organized ways — from websites to organizations such as Seeds for Peace. Shaw also discusses the Peace Corps. His explicit message is that Peace Corps volunteers have changed the lives of people in other countries; however, he does not mention how the lives of the volunteers have changed. This stance reflects a tacit ideology that may dangerously imply that Americans are the imparters of knowledge to the “less developed” people. 

The book ends with suggestions of actions youth can take. Shaw profiles an 18-year-old who has been proactive in trying to bring about change by creating a website where teens can discuss topics such as racism, violence, and discrimination, and where other young people can learn about important resources. Shaw also provides a list of website resources that young people may consult in order to see how they may be more active players in bringing about change. 

The overall message of Peace is positive and the book is worth reading. The targeted readers — young people — have an opportunity to read their peers’ opinions. However, one significant shortcoming of the book is that its content seems too brief and simplified, almost as if to make the book a quick and entertaining read. Although this book only provides one layer in a discussion, Peace may provide the hook for some youth to begin to explore this crucial topic. 

A.K. 

Back to Table of Contents



Harvard Education Publishing Group

Publishers of Harvard Educational Review, Harvard Education Letter and Harvard Education Press books
Harvard Graduate School of Education | Harvard University
Contact us at: 8 Story Street, 1st Floor, Cambridge, MA USA 02138
Phone: 617-495-3432 | Fax: 617-496-3584 | Email: hepg@harvard.edu

HEPG Permissions Policy | HGSE Publishing Policies and Disclaimers
Last updated: August 26, 2003 | Questions or comments about the site: hepg@harvard.edu
Copyright © 2003 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College